Helping parents nurture healthy babies

Comments on Blog enrty "Parsing Words"

Login or Register to post
8 replies [Last post]
Erin
User offline. Last seen 1 year 41 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 2007-06-23

I am creating this thread so people who wish to do so can still comment on the blog entries.
My comment:

It is interesting to see the makers of this site talking about "parsing words." They too have used words to their own advantage, to change meaning and try to twist it into being about something other than the real issue at hand. Trying to make the formula sample bags in hospitals about "freedom," "choice," "rights," and "access to information."

I think the problem with the bill is probably that when one word is used, it has law enforcement behind it, and the other word simply says it is allowed, but provides no legal backing. People who actively work for breastfeeding legislation to be changed want to have the protection of law, meaning that an officer could come and take a person away from the scene who is insisting that a breastfeeding mother leave the premises. If the person did not comply, then the officer could arrest or fine that person. It goes along the same lines as harassment being backed by law: if somebody is harassing somebody else, say, following them around a shopping mall and yelling insults at them, then an officer can arrest that person for harassment or for disturbing the peace. If breastfeeding moms in public ever need police protection from somebody harassing them, then they could potentially get them on this - harassment or disturbing the peace - if the breastfeeding legislation provides no actual enforcement of the law.

So yes, it is something to celebrate - and hopefully moms who cannot get the law enforced can get it done in other ways. And as long as the harassers don't *know* it's not enforceable, then they should back off at the first mention of getting the police involved!

But really, why make laws you cannot enforce? The officer says, "She has a right to breastfeed here - there is a law." The harasser says, "What will you do if I don't quit asking her to leave?" The officer says, "Uh, well, I can't do anything about that, really." Hopefully he'd instead say, "If you don't comply, I can get you on harassment."

Oh, and to the blogger: the phrase is "for all intents and purposes," not "for all intensive purposes," just fyi.

libbylu
User offline. Last seen 1 year 41 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 2007-07-09
Comments on Blog enrty "Parsing Words"

I have the "freedom" not be be beaten by my husband.

Isn't that a nice thought?

Let's celebrate that freedom.

We'll work on "rights" later.

libbylu
User offline. Last seen 1 year 41 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 2007-07-09
Comments on Blog enrty "Parsing Words"

Women have the freedom to buy formula in the grocery store.

They have the freedom to find information on formula feeding on the internet or in a library or at the bookstore.

They have the freedom to formul feed in public.

They have the freedom to ignore anyone who says they should feel guilty and know that they are doing what they know to be best for their child.

So with all these wonderful freedoms, why is this site necessary?

Really...why can't the formula feeders just be happy with what they got?

mom2my2pumpkins
User offline. Last seen 1 year 41 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 2007-07-08
Comments on Blog enrty "Parsing Words"

I'm reading some of the posts, and I found the last one to be very insulting. So many of you are pro-breastfeeding...we all get that. So many of you are intolerant of anyone else's point of view (at least if it differs from your own)...we all get that. We also get that you feel that your freedoms are different from those of us who chose - for whatever reason - to formula feed.

What I find insulting is the phrase "They have the freedom to ignore anyone who says they should feel guilty". Not for one second of one day did I or have I ever felt guilty for formula feeding my children. I was unable to breastfeed for medical reasons...does that make me less of a mother? I don't think so. Does the fact that you chose/were able to breastfeed your children make you a better mother that me? I definitely don't think so.

I choose to live my life without judging others for their choices. I don't feel that I have the right to tell others what is better for them in their personal lives...anymore than I want anyone telling me what to do in mine.

For the record, I have 2 children. They both are incredibly well adjusted, intelligent kids who excel in athletics. I am also a NICU nurse with a master's degree. I am married to a physician, and we make the decisions for our children together, for their benefit.

Lisa in PA

Erin
User offline. Last seen 1 year 41 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 2007-06-23
Comments on Blog enrty "Parsing Words"

mom2my2pumpkins wrote:
So many of you are intolerant of anyone else's point of view (at least if it differs from your own)...we all get that. We also get that you feel that your freedoms are different from those of us who chose - for whatever reason - to formula feed.

If you are "getting" that people who are pro-breastfeeding are intolerant of anyone else's views, then you're not really "getting" it. This isn't about other people's views - this is about formula marketing in hospitals and how they are paid to hand out these samples to every new mom, and it has been shown that these samples can be detrimental to breastfeeding in the early weeks. That is what this is about. I am not sure why you are so positive that everyone is "intolerant." That's an easy accusation to make, because the word gets thrown around so often these days. Is stating facts intolerant? No. Is saying that nearly all women have the ability to breastfeed, but some have reasons that may be physical, emotional, or otherwise which make them choose formula - which is okay - intolerant? You say you have medical reasons for not breastfeeding - well, if so, then I am "tolerant" of that choice. It's okay. But this is not even about "tolerance" - this is about unethical marketing practices in hospitals, and many of the posts in this forum address that and are no way intended to be intolerant; rather, they point out the problems with the marketing in hospitals.

Please explain, though, how breastfeeding supporters here feel that our freedoms are different from those who formula-feed. Please explain that - I truly do not see what you mean, because I see our freedoms as being the same.

You say this phrase is insulting: ""They have the freedom to ignore anyone who says they should feel guilty." And then you say you have never felt guilty at all... well, that's good! If you made a choice that you are 100% okay with and know in your heart and mind that it is best, then you have no need to feel guilty. That is a good thing that you don't feel any guilt... and it means that even if somebody has tried to make you feel guilty, you didn't let them have that power over you, because you knew you did what was best in your specific situation at the time. We all have the freedom to ignore people who make us feel guilty for any actions we take - that is part of being truly "free" within yourself - free of guilt or bad feelings, because you are confident and don't let other people's judgments dictate the way you feel.

You do say, however, that you "choose to live your life without judging others for their choices" (and nobody here is judging moms who use formula, btw)... but you sure seem to be judging people's intents and thoughts, as you have said we are "intolerant of anyone else's view" and that you apparently think some of us feel we are "better mothers" than you for breastfeeding... and that is an unfair judgment, because it is simply untrue. this isn't about judging who is a better mother or about not accepting other people's views... we are all trying to do that here and to focus the discussion on the real issue of formula marketing in hospitals. Why is it that people can preach about not judging others, but then they can go right ahead and mistakenly judge other people as being "intolerant?"

If you'd like to discuss the implications of formula marketing in hospitals, then please read more of the posts and join in on the discussion.

mom2my2pumpkins
User offline. Last seen 1 year 41 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 2007-07-08
Comments on Blog enrty "Parsing Words"

Erin,

I'm not going to get into a pissing contest with you on this topic. You just need to know that no matter how much you talk/type at me, you will not change my feelings. I have read a good number of the posts...and I get the same tone from a lot of them. You are going to talk/bully/force your opinions onto others, whether we want to hear them or not.

Please hear the sarcasm in my words here...I am SOOOOO glad you are "tolerant" of my medical reasons for not being able to breastfeed. Would you like to know why I was unable to breastfeed? I had cancer 7 years ago, and the treatment left me unable to breastfeed my now 5-year-old son. Sooo glad you tolerate that.

As for the implications of marketing formula in the hospitals, as a NICU nurse, (and I'm sure you know what a NICU is), we use formula everyday. We rotate the brand every month between the brands, unless a baby needs a special formulation. We give the take-home bags to our moms, and a lot of them use them to bring us the expressed breastmilk back. The bags are insulated, and are great for that. I think you need to give women more credit than you do. A take-home diaper bag is not going to change someone's mind not to breastfeed if they have made the decision to do that.

Since you feel so strongly about pushing breastfeeding on people, I suggest you go volunteer your services for free...be a free lactation consultant for women who need it. I know around here, the lactation consultants are pretty expensive, no one donates their services. Just be prepared for some women (shock!) may not want it.

Lisa

momofboyz
User offline. Last seen 1 year 41 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 2007-07-06
Comments on Blog enrty "Parsing Words"

Hurray Lisa from PA.

Erin
User offline. Last seen 1 year 41 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 2007-06-23
Comments on Blog enrty "Parsing Words"

mom2my2pumpkins wrote:
I'm not going to get into a pissing contest with you on this topic. You just need to know that no matter how much you talk/type at me, you will not change my feelings. I have read a good number of the posts...and I get the same tone from a lot of them. You are going to talk/bully/force your opinions onto others, whether we want to hear them or not.

Mom2my2pumpkins,

I get the feeling from this post that you have decided to be angry at me and actually dislike me, even though you do not know me. I was hoping to have a discussion, not a "pissing contest." But if you are going to *decide* that I am a bully, then I don't think I can have a reasonable discussion with you. If you would, please go back through my posts and find specific quotes where I am trying to "bully" formula-feeding moms. Also, the "whether we want to hear them or not" line seems like an attempt to use fighting words with me - because truly, if you don't want to hear them, then nobody is making you read them. You are giving me way too much power over people if you think they are being "bullied" or "forced" by me - how can I force anyone to read my opinions, when I am in another state, behind a different computer screen, not even knowing who these people are in real life?

You said: "Please hear the sarcasm in my words here...I am SOOOOO glad you are "tolerant" of my medical reasons for not being able to breastfeed. Would you like to know why I was unable to breastfeed? I had cancer 7 years ago, and the treatment left me unable to breastfeed my now 5-year-old son. Sooo glad you tolerate that. "
And now you are openly being sarcastic with me, another sign that you do not want to have a real discussion. I have not been sarcastic with you, have I? Perhaps you didn't understand what I was saying - *you* are the one who accused people here of being "intolerant of everyone else's opinions." So I was merely using the word back to you in an effort to show that I was not "intolerant." I acknowledged the fact that yes, there are reasons women cannot breastfeed - very real reasons - so maybe I should have used a stronger word than "tolerance." I probably should have said that I completely understand that there are reasons that women cannot breastfeed. I was just trying to use the word you used so that it would relate. I was certainly not trying to act like I was giving you permission or anything - of course not! There are very real issues that hinder breastfeeding, and in no way do I ever wish to make light of those cases. I should not have used the word "tolerant" there. I am sorry for the misunderstanding.

You write: "As for the implications of marketing formula in the hospitals, as a NICU nurse, (and I'm sure you know what a NICU is), we use formula everyday. We rotate the brand every month between the brands, unless a baby needs a special formulation. We give the take-home bags to our moms, and a lot of them use them to bring us the expressed breastmilk back. The bags are insulated, and are great for that. I think you need to give women more credit than you do. A take-home diaper bag is not going to change someone's mind not to breastfeed if they have made the decision to do that."
The formula given to babies in the NICU is not from the samples - it is separate. Since you are an NICU nurse, could you tell us how that formula is obtained (I am seriously asking here)? I was under the impression that it was bought by the hospital, whereas the samples were just given to the hospitals... is that accurate? I may not be right on how they get the formula for the NICU, but I do know that it is not from the bags of sample formula. But to read more about the implications of the formula samples on some breastfeeding mothers (not all, of course), see the post from Alison on that topic - it is a pretty recent one, and she pointed out how the samples do indeed cause harm to breastfeeding relationships in many instances, especially those moms who are more "on the fence" about nursing. It's not just the diaper bags - I agree, those can't do much harm at all, and in fact, I use the little freezer packs from the one I was given to keep my lunch cold, ha ha, and the little Similac logo didn't influence me in the least. It's not about the bags themselves or the ice packs - it is when the bags include actual samples of formula. But Alison explains it well enough in her post, so I will stop here on that topic.

You write, "Since you feel so strongly about pushing breastfeeding on people, I suggest you go volunteer your services for free...be a free lactation consultant for women who need it. I know around here, the lactation consultants are pretty expensive, no one donates their services. Just be prepared for some women (shock!) may not want it."
Again, the sarcasm is really not needed. I am well aware that some women may not want support from an LC. And I am actually working toward becoming a breastfeeding counselor - not a certified LC, but I am studying and have to be certified in this position and will then be able to help women who come to me with breastfeeding problems or questions - and no, I don't plan on chasing them down, but on letting them come to me of their own free will, just as people on this site are reading posts of their own free will. And it is volunteer - I will not get paid for this in any way, and in fact have had to put some of my own money into it.

I do not quite see how people can *assume* bad things about a person - calling them intolerant or bullies - but then those who were called bullies cannot say anything back without the fear of being "intolerant." Somehow it is seen as okay to call somebody an intolerant bully based on a perception of that person's intent (however wrong that perception may be)... but the person being called names and having assumptions made about her words is not permitted to say others are being "bullies" or "intolerant" to her. Again, if you can find something I have written that shows I am trying to be a bully, then please bring it to my attention... not something that you assume to be an intent to bully, but something that is clearly rude and uncalled for. And if you see something that you *feel* (not know, but feel) is an intent on my part to bully somebody, then you can ask me rather than accusing me - something along the lines of, "That sounded like you are saying x, which isn't very kind. Could you please clarify?"

I would also really like clarification on this statement you made: "We also get that you feel that your freedoms are different from those of us who chose - for whatever reason - to formula feed." I still don't understand what this is supposed to mean or what it is in reference to... how have I shown that I think my freedoms are different from yours?

I am really trying to be civil and not get emotional here - I am just trying to have a debate, which is allowed on this forum. I have said it before - I am truly not trying to be mean to anyone here, and it is unfortunate that some people will not take me at my word. I believe what others here claim about themselves, and I am also trying to be factual and attempting to debate the issue - I am not out to bully anyone. And if anyone chooses not to believe me, then I cannot force them. All I can do is try to communicate.

alison
User offline. Last seen 1 year 41 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 2007-06-26
Comments on Blog enrty "Parsing Words"

mom2my2pumpkins wrote:
I think you need to give women more credit than you do. A take-home diaper bag is not going to change someone's mind not to breastfeed if they have made the decision to do that.

The problem is, a Cochrane review of 11 randomized controlled trials found that the bags undermine women who plan to breastfeed -- even if there are no formula samples in the bag. Those who were randomly assigned to commercial bags started supplementing earlier.

Another study found that, if a woman got a formula-company bag at the first prenatal visit, she was five times more likely to give up on breastfeeding before hospital discharge than if she was given a non-commercial bag. Furthermore, among moms who were uncertain about how long they wanted to breastfeeding, those who got a commerical bag at the first prenatal visit quit nursing more than a month earlier. (see http://www.greenjournal.org/cgi/content/abstract/95/2/296 )

These moms got great support -- they delivered at a Baby Friendly Hospital, and had follow-up phone calls from lactation consultants -- but commerical materials provided months before delivery let them to wean earlier.

All medical organizations recommend six months of exclusive breastfeeding, unless medically contraindicated. It is concerning, at best, for hospitals to distribute samples that undermine women who wish to follow these recommendations.